Main Page
The Latest
Tax Bodies
in Support
FAQ
No Inflation
Why?

Toolkit

Comments

Contacts
Links
U.S. Proposal


1.  Sample Resolution
2.  Sample Letter or Fax
3.  Bank of Canada Report

1.  Sample Resolution (Just replace the name of the tax body).

CITY OF EDMONTON RESOLUTION 

WHEREAS, the City of Edmonton must from time to time 
authorize the issue of bonds to finance capital projects that are 
necessary to ensure the health and welfare of the citizens of 
Edmonton; and 

WHEREAS, the City of Edmonton recognizes the fact that 
the cost of interest for bonds issued to fund capital projects is a 
great burden on the taxpayers of Edmonton; and 

WHEREAS, the Bank of Canada has the responsibility and the 
authority to "regulate credit and currency in the best interests of 
the economic life of the nation"; 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that:

a)  The City of Edmonton request the Government of Canada to 
instruct the Bank of Canada to create and issue interest-free loans 
to the provinces, which in turn would make interest-free loans to 
the municipalities for the purpose of funding capital projects and 
for paying off existing debts. 

b)  That a copy of this motion be forwarded to the Federation of 
Canadian Municipalities requesting their support and endorsement.


2.  Sample Letter or Fax (Address individually to each elected official
and relate the proposal to local issues and budgetary projections).

Name
Address
Contact Information

Date,

Dear  -------

The Federation of Canadian Municipalities has asked its membership 
"to submit resolutions on subjects of national municipal interest".  
An advisory petition which requests the Canadian Parliament to 
instruct the Bank of Canada to create and issue interest-free loans 
to tax-supported bodies fits this criterion.  A resolution to this effect 
has been passed recently by the city councils of Squamish B.C. and 
Kingston Ontario.  

In the United States, city councils and taxpayer bodies representing 
100 million Americans have passed a similar proposal calling on the 
Federal Reserve to provide interest-free loans.  You can read about 
the American experience at www.loansinterestfree.com.  There will 
be a Canadian website ready shortly.

The 2000-2004 Capital Priorities Plan and Budget mentions an 
Edmonton "infrastructure funding gap".  Under the present system, 
interest charges on the required borrowing force the city to pay two 
to three times more than the original cost of a project.  This leaves 
fewer tax revenues for such things as LRT expansion.  With 
interest-free loans the LRT could be extended both south and west, 
improving our environment and enhancing the downtown core as a 
transportation hub. 

The Bank of Canada has been used in the past as a catalyst for 
change.  It issued money to allow Canada to escape the Depression, 
fight WWII, and lay the foundation for the best 25 years Western 
capitalism has ever known.  It is time for another war.  A war 
against poverty, pollution, inadequate housing and our decaying 
infrastructure.

As you are well aware, infrastructure is also critical for success on 
the international stage.  Interest-free loans for restoring and 
expanding the capital projects of the City of Edmonton would be a 
boon to local businesses for this reason.  We would like to discuss 
the attached resolution with you at your earliest convenience and 
would be happy to answer your questions or do further research for 
any issues you might raise.

Sincerely


3.  Bank of Canada Report Research (Thanks to Marc Bombois).

Every Friday, the Bank of Canada publishes its Weekly Financial Statistics
which is available online at http://www.bankofcanada.ca/pdf/wfs.pdf .
On page 11 we find "Monetary Aggregates and Their Components", 
or Canada's money supply figures. The first column (B2001) is 
"Currency outside banks" (i.e. actual cash, the money supplied by 
the Bank of Canada). Look at the monthly figures and note how they 
fluctuate.
 
Now let's compare Feb. 2000 to Feb. 2001, and see that the amount 
of currency in circulation increased by $1.37 billion, or 4.2%. This is 
a fairly typical yearly increase in cash money. Bear in mind that this 
cash is only one component of the total money supply, and a small 
component at that.
 
Looking at pages 11 and 12 you will see that there are different 
"monetary aggregates". We're going to use M2+, which is an 
accepted and often used measure of Canada's money supply. 
Now look at M2+ total, column B2037, and note the monthly 
fluctuations.
 
As with the cash component let's compare M2+ at Jan. 2000 and 
Jan. 2001, the latest figure available. The money supply has 
increased by $28.69 billion, or 4.3%, virtually the same percentage 
increase as the cash component.
 
Since the cash component is part of M2+, the non-cash increase in 
total money supply is $27.32 billion ($28.69b - $1.37b). This $27.32 
billion was money, or deposits, created by banking institutions
by issuing loans. The $1.37 billion the Bank of Canada created is 
less than 5% of the total increase. Canada had a far healthier 
economy and infrastructure when the Bank of Canada was issuing 
between one third and one half of the Canadian money supply.
Taxes were much lower, unemployment was lower, INFLATION 
was low, and our dollar was strong  

The Bank of Canada is wholly owned by the government of Canada and is 
fully empowered to create money, which it obviously does now but in 
small part. The Bank of Canada can and should provide low- or no-interest 
funding to all levels of government for capital infrastructure projects or for 
the retirement of interest-laden debt. This would be non-inflationary and 
would stimulate local, regional, and national economies.
 
It is recommended that municipal councils pass resolutions in favour of 
this proposal and petition the federal Minister of Finance to instruct the 
governor of the Bank of Canada to change its monetary policy to benefit 
the citizens of Canada.

Back to top.